“…In an op-ed in the Washington Post in May, former FBI director James Comey referred to Mifsud as a “Russian agent”, although he did not say why he believed that to be the case. Mueller’s report does not directly make the same allegation. For his part, Papadopoulos has repeatedly suggested, without presenting any evidence, that Mifsud was working for Western intelligence agencies in an effort to tarnish Trump…”Reuters October 9,2019/7:33AM/19 DAYS AGO October 9, 2019 / 7:33 AM / 19 days ago
This paragraph copied from a Reuters article about the mysterious Mr Mifsud, perhaps the most important figure in the Russia Trump concerns, illustrates media use of the phrase “without evidence”.
*James Comey referred to Mifsud as a “Russian agent”, although he did not say why he believed that to be the case.
*Papadopoulos has repeatedly suggested, without presenting any evidence, that Mifsud was working for Western intelligence agencies in an effort to tarnish Trump.
Today I read the first plausible explanation of the much vaunted/ridiculed probe of President Trump being conducted by Mr. Mueller.
The article by Tom Burman in Saturday’s, November 10, 2018 Toronto Star seems plausible because its key reference is Mr. Trump’s declaration of bankruptcy, followed by solvency that from my media reported perspective never made sense; I thought that once you were bankrupt you were bankrupt. Mr. Trump says that his unexpected bankruptcy and sudden solvency were the result of his clever use of US bankruptcy law. But Tom Burden of the Toronto Star says that Trump was saved from bankruptcy by the Russian mafia then made President of the United States by the Russian secret service.
George Washington, real-estate warrior, political father of America and of the world’s first universal male vote dreaded the possibility that every little American would be born a little Tory or a little Wig.
…”It was Washington who warned against the formation of political parties and urged the nation to choose leaders for reasons that transcended partisan politics…”
I just put Clinton into the Google box(December 27,2016) and got The New York Times,11 hrs ago,
IBTimes UK · 6 hours ago and
Daily Mail · 5 hours ago
In a Trump search I got 2 NYT’s headers to 1 British; for Clinton it’s 2 British headers to one NYT.
If there is an independent journalist around they should do one of those “Explained” pieces as in what’s the connection between The New York Times, The Guardian and other British media “Explained”, a book even, if anyone reads hard copy print anymore.